for people that don't know you need to install Net Framework 2.0/3.0 in the windows optional features on windows10/11 or just run a Net Framework 3.5 installer and windows 10/11 should do it automatically. for windows 7 and older you have to install Net Framework 3.5, Net Framework 4.0+ is too new.
Is there a fix "CLR error: 80004005. The program will now terminate." OBMM is the Utility that is affected. Why can,t these OMODers just make mods for modern mod managers instead of this redundant antique?
you need to install Net Framework 2.0/3.0 stuff in the windows optional features on windows10/11 for windows 7 and older you have to install 3.5, net 4+ is too new.
Failed to launch 'nxm://oblivion/mods/2097/files/34275?key=iYOZi7NzrhLE5NhMjzoa5g&expires=1707483218&user_id=201077192' because the scheme does not have a registered handler.
Don't use this. You will run into issues either immediately or soon. Instead use Mod Organizer 2. It's available from Nexus Mods as well. (I hope this doesn't count as advertising "competition", because this isn't my intention at all.)
Regardless, I respect the legacy this software represents.
Or, better yet.. use Wrye Bash, which was actually designed for Oblivion, and works fantastically well, without headaches. MO2 is fine for Skyrim and FO4, but Wrye Bash/Mash are superior for older Bethesda games.
I came here looking for information on this very subject. It's been years since I modded Oblivion and MO2 didn't open OMOD files back then so I had to do a workaround using this mod manager here then transfer the files into the right folders for MO2 to read them.
I am guessing MO2 still does NOT open OMOD files? If not, is there a way to convert an OMOD file into something MO2 will read?
I'm new to modding can someone clear something up for me:
I can get some mods working such as Maskars overhaul and I know they are functioning as an omod as it's obvious in the game and OBMM shows me the blue box on the right side.
However some mods I've downloaded through Vortex don't need to be installed through OBMM (such as the unofficial patch) and appear on the left side of OBMM with a box that can be ticked, and I can tell are functioning without being created as an omod.
The one i'm having an issue with is the guild extension mods, I've downloaded them on Vortex, they appear in OBMM (left-side) and I can add them as an omod. However when I do that it's says it's overwriting the existing version. Does that mean that the guild mods which are on the left are already functioning and don't need to be created as omods?
If I have the mod installed in Vortex and I create an OMOD for it in OBMM, am I basically doing the same thing twice?
1319 comments
for windows 7 and older you have to install Net Framework 3.5, Net Framework 4.0+ is too new.
Failed to launch 'nxm://oblivion/mods/2097/files/34275?key=iYOZi7NzrhLE5NhMjzoa5g&expires=1707483218&user_id=201077192' because the scheme does not have a registered handler.
how do i download this files?
Regardless, I respect the legacy this software represents.
any mod made in this format is NOT user friendly at all
I am guessing MO2 still does NOT open OMOD files? If not, is there a way to convert an OMOD file into something MO2 will read?
I can get some mods working such as Maskars overhaul and I know they are functioning as an omod as it's obvious in the game and OBMM shows me the blue box on the right side.
However some mods I've downloaded through Vortex don't need to be installed through OBMM (such as the unofficial patch) and appear on the left side of OBMM with a box that can be ticked, and I can tell are functioning without being created as an omod.
The one i'm having an issue with is the guild extension mods, I've downloaded them on Vortex, they appear in OBMM (left-side) and I can add them as an omod. However when I do that it's says it's overwriting the existing version. Does that mean that the guild mods which are on the left are already functioning and don't need to be created as omods?
If I have the mod installed in Vortex and I create an OMOD for it in OBMM, am I basically doing the same thing twice?
Thanks