12 comments

1. 

   connorA380

   • member
   • 0 kudos
   Locked

   Sticky

   28 January 2013, 4:05PM

   I think a better answer for the question about the overseer is to have it say MY DICK!, just an idea, tired to get it to work, but with little effect.
2. 

   Hiwatcher1

   • premium
   • 3 kudos
   Locked

   Sticky

   01 October 2012, 12:57AM

   Endorsed. Adds depth and immersion to the game.
3. 

   yk0520

   • member
   • 1 kudos
   Locked

   Sticky

   12 August 2011, 8:37AM

   Nice change from the almost guaranteed "Shift Supervisor/Overseer's Underling" results. Now,if I could find a way to insure I get the medical job (Clinical Test Subject?). Any suggested answers? One thing. Shouldn't the new answer for question one (...his anger is a sign of clinical depression....) be both speech and medicine?
4. 

   hackeysack

   • member
   • 3 kudos
   Locked

   Sticky

   04 September 2009, 7:38AM

   Ok, the last answer has a <blank> option now.
5. 

   User_1401833

   • account closed
   • 4 kudos
   Locked

   Sticky

   04 September 2009, 4:01AM

   For the tenth qeustion, can you add an option to leave it blank, so it looks like this:
   
   The overseer
   The overseer
   The overseer
   <Blank>
   
   or something like that?
6. 

   Winterfall

   • supporter
   • 40 kudos
   Locked

   Sticky

   02 September 2009, 4:36PM

   The G.O.A.T. is really just something stupid the overseer cooked up. I always cheat on it ">
7. 

   sieboldii2

   • member
   • 54 kudos
   Locked

   Sticky

   02 September 2009, 2:52PM

   Nice options. I had gotten tired of being an overseer trainee and had opted to fill in my own G.O.A.T.
8. 

   hackeysack

   • member
   • 3 kudos
   Locked

   Sticky

   02 September 2009, 2:01PM

   k the typo is fixed.
9. 

   hackeysack

   • member
   • 3 kudos
   Locked

   Sticky

   02 September 2009, 1:46PM

   oh my bad, one sec I'll fix that.
10. 

    Grizzly_UK

    • member
    • 36 kudos
    Locked

    Sticky

    02 September 2009, 1:40PM

    There's a "typo" in the answer to question 1. The question refers to a "quantum harmonizer" but the new answer refers to a "quantum harminzer". Clearly seen in the "A1" screenshot, but it's a minor error that can easily be corrected when you update with other improvements and/or corrections.