Any proofs? I just know that this mod is not better, which is clear from the code, but I would like to know, what is the basis for your opposite conclusions? How was an identical environment for tests created (Especially considering the fact that the longer you are in the round, the more FPS you get)? What test programs were used? Can you attach the files obtained during the testing?
This mod works better for me too. It's like yours but with more optimizations. I definitely get more fps and smoother gameplay on my machine. Maybe you should look into making yours better instead of going ad hominem mode by insulting the creator and anyone who prefers his over yours. You said your mod was better than every other performance mod, yet you didn't show any proof besides some silly graphs that don't even name the mods you compare it to. The Floptimizer does everything yours does and more. How is it not better?
First of all, where did you see that I insulted anyone? Secondly, how can you make claims based on results that are not from tests? I have results obtained under ideal (as much as possible) conditions, where it is clearly shown that this mod is worse. This is evident from the code as well. Since you are not knowledgeable in this area, and I believe you do not have the qualifications to conduct reliable tests, your words are nonsense, especially the part about "...does everything yours does and more." My graph shows a comparison with other mods, but there are no names precisely because I do not want to offend anyone; it's strange that you did not understand this. However, there are exact version names next to it, which are unique to these mods, so anyone who wants to find them can do so. Since the burden of proof lies with the accuser, I am not obliged to prove anything to you, and I would like to remind you that you have the right to choose any mod, but you cannot claim that this mod works better.
Where's your proof that the mod creator and everyone else doesn't know what they are doing but you do? You insulted him in your mod's thread. Your graphs are as meaningless as my words because they do not show what tests you actually ran and what the conditions are. I can make a graph in 2 seconds with fake values and fake names too. This .ini does in fact do what yours does and expands on it. The game runs better on both of my machines with this mod than it does with yours. I don't need to prove anything to you, you are not an authority on anything. If it works better for me, I am allowed to post that it's better, just as you are allowed to act like everyone is dumb and you're smarter than everyone else even though you clearly aren't.
You said you did the tests yourself. Show them then.
You know, it's difficult for me to convey the answer to the first question to a person who is not familiar with programming and the engine in general. For example, would a knowledgeable person first write AllowAsyncRenderThreadUpdates=trueand then change it to AllowAsyncRenderThreadUpdates=1? Of course not; we won't even talk about the command itself. Or would they remove about 10 lines of code compared to previous versions of this mod? This means they recognized their mistake and removed those lines, though unfortunately not all of them. I think if you ask the creator of this mod, he will confirm that he is a newbie in this. You continue to say that I have insulted someone, but you haven't provided a single piece of evidence. Please clarify what exactly I said. My graphs make more sense than your words because I created the mod, which implies that I have some skills in this area. Specifically, your account has zero mods, so until you prove otherwise, your word holds no weight. I did not specify how the testing was conducted (on the other hand, I don't know how to indicate all of that in a picture), but it has never been disputed during this time, and people who commented and conducted their tests agreed with my results. This .ini file definitely does not do the same thing as my mod, nor does it expand upon it. To verify this, you just need to open both files and visually compare them. You keep saying that this mod works better, but you base your claims solely on subjective facts. If you had conducted tests, you would have found that this mod performs worse. In my previous message, I already explained why you are obligated to provide evidence, as the burden of proof lies with the accuser. I may not be an authority, but at least I have done something for the community and have helped for free even with issues unrelated to the mod. You have done none of this, which means you are an even lesser authority than I am. You can say whatever you want, but you cannot claim that this mod works better because that is not true; your assertions are based solely on subjective facts. I never said that I am smarter than everyone else, but compared to other mods, mine is the best. Doesn't it seem strange to ask for tests from what you consider a non-authoritative source? My mod is better by 0.1% by more than 10%.
I can easily say you have no idea what you're doing too because this "newbie" author made a better performance mod than you. You're not an authority of anything. Telling people they don't know what they are doing and to not use this mod is insulting and condescending, especially when your credentials are just as nonexistent as anyone else. I am not making any accusations and this isn't a court. The "burden of proof" would lie on the tough guy going to someone else's mod thread telling everyone he doesn't understand the engine and that your mod is better. I am simply stating I like this mod more than yours because it WORKS BETTER for me. You're the one in someone else's mod thread getting mad at everyone who likes it. You said you did the tests, show them or shut up.
Maybe someday an authoritative person for you will come here and confirm my point of view, but for now, I see no point in further dialogue, as you don't care about my words.
your assertions are based solely on subjective facts.
So you don't have these "tests" you apparently conducted to prove that your mod is somehow better than this one, even though this one clearly makes the game run better than yours. Got it. Stop spreading misinformation without proof.
Please stop spreading misinformation without proof. This mod does in fact make my PC run better than yours. Do not talk trash on someone else's mod thread without being able to back it up. You are the one who doesn't know what they are doing if this "newbie" author can pull out something way more performative than yours.
Keep ignoring the fact that you came to someone else's mod to say yours is better without any proof. This mod makes the game run better on two of my machines in comparison to yours. If you did the tests like you said, post them or shut up. You're not an authority on UE5. If you were, this "newbie" author wouldn't do better work than you. A fixed graph with no actual information is not proof of anything.
Please learn more about UE5 so you can make your mod as good as this one. Then you won't have to come here to someone else's thread saying his mod isn't a good as yours without any proof. It is better, you're the only one saying it isn't because you're insecure.
Your mod is still worse and you still lied about having proof that it's better. Show the proof or stop badmouthing the author of a superior mod. Multiple people in this thread have confirmed that it's better than yours. Get over yourself.
So.. what's the difference between this and jack's popular performance fps boost mod ? you both use scalibility.. honestly i'm having a rough time with fps drops and memory leaks/cpu bottleneck with rtx 3060 and 5600x /16gb ram even with jack's mod, so will this make it better ?
cpu bottlenecks are tough to overcome but my mod uses certain commands to ease the resources given to the cpu as well as GPU. Jack has a great mod and as for me i take a different approach by making optimizations to threading and tuning LOD scaling more aggressively. so if you have issues with specifically a cpu bottleneck you may find good results with my mod as it tries to optimize for both GPU and CPU as much as it can
so yes it should make performance better especially for your issues
yo so i started using ur mod and played 1 game and tested it in practice and i can say that it gives almost the same if not the same fps as jack's mod and i think looks the same.. but from the game i played in klyntar map it does feel a bit smoother in fights than it was with jack's mod, but it may be a placeabo so i need more testing on the cpu bottleneck maps like the tokyo ones.. sadly the game will eat 15.7 gb of my ram eventually and i think that effects fps drops and how smooth the game is in fights and stuff, as this issue can only be fixed by the devs..
overall i'll tell u what happens later in the day when i test the mod more
cool! these mods are especially good when dealing with gpu bottlenecks but not so much cpu so thats to be expected.
also side note make sure you have dual channel ram for this game (just two sticks of ram instead of one) it helps a LOT with cpu performance. so if you have just one stick a second one would be a good investment. ofc making sure they are the same brand and specs.
unless i find new commands that work substantially for cpu performance the rest will have to be left to the devs for optimizing :(
should i use jack's mod or yours for my problems --> cpu bottlenecks (fps randomly capping itself to 80) and game computer constantly using 96-8% ram even if rivals is the only thing open (16 gb ram)
you should look into debloating your pc, restarting nvidia control panel, and just overall all making sure things are stable. the less your cpu has to focus on other things the more itll be able to prepare frames for the gpu. what are your settings in game? monitor temps in case you are experiencing thermal throttling make sure your pc is getting as much resources as it can oh and limit your fps if youre cpu is super struggling but the game shouldnt be using literally ALL the ram so check task manager
as for the mod its honestly up to you. i think my mod lessens the load on the cpu in theory but its not like a have a test bench running 24/7. if you dont like how my mod looks then thats okay choose whichever you want
After using this for a bit i'm not using it anymore. It does seem to improve fps but there several problems such as it removes the teammate silhouettes when they are behind walls which is pretty bad. Also, it makes one of the maps super dark so you can't see anything. And it also makes the "b" button breakable view mode not work.
@partyB01 many others do the Scalability.ini format since that is what works but i assure you that i did my own research for the commands i have used :)
The mod is perfect except for one thing: How do I reenable the outlines for allies when they're behind walls? These were just gone after I installed the mod and I couldn't bounce heals behind walls.
60 comments
If you think there are any further improvements possible for CPU usage please do them!! Prayge
I just know that this mod is not better, which is clear from the code, but I would like to know, what is the basis for your opposite conclusions? How was an identical environment for tests created (Especially considering the fact that the longer you are in the round, the more FPS you get)? What test programs were used? Can you attach the files obtained during the testing?
You said you did the tests yourself. Show them then.
You continue to say that I have insulted someone, but you haven't provided a single piece of evidence. Please clarify what exactly I said.
My graphs make more sense than your words because I created the mod, which implies that I have some skills in this area. Specifically, your account has zero mods, so until you prove otherwise, your word holds no weight. I did not specify how the testing was conducted (on the other hand, I don't know how to indicate all of that in a picture), but it has never been disputed during this time, and people who commented and conducted their tests agreed with my results.
This .ini file definitely does not do the same thing as my mod, nor does it expand upon it. To verify this, you just need to open both files and visually compare them.
You keep saying that this mod works better, but you base your claims solely on subjective facts. If you had conducted tests, you would have found that this mod performs worse.
In my previous message, I already explained why you are obligated to provide evidence, as the burden of proof lies with the accuser. I may not be an authority, but at least I have done something for the community and have helped for free even with issues unrelated to the mod. You have done none of this, which means you are an even lesser authority than I am.
You can say whatever you want, but you cannot claim that this mod works better because that is not true; your assertions are based solely on subjective facts.
I never said that I am smarter than everyone else, but compared to other mods, mine is the best.
Doesn't it seem strange to ask for tests from what you consider a non-authoritative source? My mod is better by 0.1% by more than 10%.
To anyone needing a TLDR:
There's another performance mod author here aggressively trying to say his mod is better without any proof.
The Floptimizer is significantly better. Try it for yourself.
so yes it should make performance better especially for your issues
overall i'll tell u what happens later in the day when i test the mod more
also side note make sure you have dual channel ram for this game (just two sticks of ram instead of one) it helps a LOT with cpu performance. so if you have just one stick a second one would be a good investment. ofc making sure they are the same brand and specs.
unless i find new commands that work substantially for cpu performance the rest will have to be left to the devs for optimizing :(
much luck!
what are your settings in game?
monitor temps in case you are experiencing thermal throttling
make sure your pc is getting as much resources as it can
oh and limit your fps if youre cpu is super struggling but the game shouldnt be using literally ALL the ram so check task manager
as for the mod its honestly up to you. i think my mod lessens the load on the cpu in theory but its not like a have a test bench running 24/7. if you dont like how my mod looks then thats okay choose whichever you want
my bad man
didnt know